Jesse Liberty - Silverlight Geek

By, For and About Silverlight Developers

Yes, but is it valuable?

The discussion on "is it really (strongly) typed" has degenerated into one of semantics and definition, and is losing sight of the original intent of my first post. So, once more unto the breach...  assume what I'm saying (that Justin's library provides type information that previously was not available) has some validity : is this a valuable thing in your code?

That is the key question. Your thoughts?

 

Posted: Aug 26 2007, 12:07 PM by jesseliberty | with 3 comment(s)
Filed under:

Comments

Yes, but is it valuable? - Jesse Liberty - Silverlight Geek said:

Pingback from  Yes, but is it valuable? - Jesse Liberty - Silverlight Geek

# August 26, 2007 1:02 PM

swildermuth said:

I am sorry to have instigated this confusion.  This technique certainly has value, I just hated to confuse the issue by implying that JScript could be typed.  This technique looks somewhat like ASP.NET AJAX's Class heirarchy stuff which I would be more likely to use but the idea behind certainly has merit.

# August 26, 2007 3:09 PM

rhp_74 said:

I think that I would rather keep my code more close to its C# Managed code counterpart.  So I would have to say NO, on the Javascript wrappers that provide Intellisense.

# August 27, 2007 4:02 PM